Please notice: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender id.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are consistently beneath hearth, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on the whole lot from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and scientific trial variety. The sort of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and 0 accountability. If that seems like a conflict on girls, nicely… you’re not fallacious.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to combat again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to impartial, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t need to learn about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Provided Well being Data is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of girls’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is important to the well-being of girls. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This contains important public well being data on matters reminiscent of HIV and sexually transmitted ailments, contraceptive utilization and security, scientific trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face important challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply limit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Thankfully, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it accessible to the general public5. This text comprises a listing of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one occasion to a different mustn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for impartial, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Function of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Ladies’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being by means of coverage, schooling, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a vital step in making certain that ailments, therapies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of girls change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by means of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more vital.
Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Sources
Under is a curated checklist of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of girls of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to important well being information and be certain that all girls have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Undertaking
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Gives free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in scientific coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one impartial group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an energetic position of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for reasonably priced, high-quality companies and is the most important supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Gives rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of girls and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Ladies
Targeted on girls aged 35 to 64, this group gives medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome getting old and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Common Hospital Heart for Ladies’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Info Heart
Gives reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life levels, with specialised assist for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.
Heart for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by means of vitamin, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply necessary—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that assist knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the onerous work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value preventing for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says
